precedent
duluan
definition
noun
there are substantial precedents for using interactive media in training
an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
adjective
a precedent case
preceding in time, order, or importance.
translation of 'precedent'
noun
duluan
example
It's a great adrenaline rush to set 'precedent' or prior learning on its ear.
This is both illogical and a 'precedent' we should not allow to be set.
I shall add to the definition of humanly free agents, that they are agents whose choices do not have fully deterministic 'precedent' causes.
It is the sort of 'precedent' we are seeing in other legislation.
We fear there may well be a 'precedent' set for the rest of her school life.
The public sentiment would have been the necessity for humanitarian considerations to overcome 'precedent' this once.
The court should never view a foreign legal decision as a 'precedent' in any way.
If 'precedent' holds, it won't be publishers of tax-help books alone who benefit.
I want the kind of 'precedent' I have seen in Europe followed here.
We all have to go through the same nonsense, which seems crazy considering the 'precedent' set at the first hearing.
The result is a game of spot the allusion, with the final mass exodus dictated more by Chekhovian 'precedent' than any kind of political logic.
Once a power to detain is held to depend on 'precedent' fact, then of course anyone subjected to it can properly invoke habeas corpus.
Is this a 'precedent' we wish to set for other great regional powers as well?
Furthermore, this is a case of general importance and it may well set a 'precedent' .
Historical 'precedent' shows pubs have changed their names through the years, usually for good reasons.
The 'precedent' it set does not augur well for future similar elections.
He said it was without 'precedent' and unfair - especially as the police had not been called in.
What a pleasing 'precedent' any unlikely victory would set!
I just want to go back to some of the 'precedent' issues of the settlement process.
Once these spaces are let go to development there would be no stopping further development because there would be a 'precedent' set.
I guess the point I want you to consider is what sort of 'precedent' we are establishing here, because it is important for the future.
So the planners want to look at what 'precedent' they are setting.
This would be an example of 'precedent' activism but not separation-of-powers activism.
If this court hears the case, they say, any decision would set a 'precedent' and would have ramifications across the country.
A lower court cannot set 'precedent' , and must follow any higher courts decision.
Critics say that the judges should have let the 1963 'precedent' stand, even if it was bad.
However, based on 'precedent' the cards are stacked against them.
All that has happened is that there is a set of 'precedent' requirements of a procedural kind before a court case can be commenced.
I am going to break with the 'precedent' set by the previous speaker and actually talk about the bill before the House.
His first and main ground is that the Inspector had no basis for his conclusion on the 'precedent' effect.
Credits: Google Translate
