precedent
ਮਿਸਾਲ
definition
noun
there are substantial precedents for using interactive media in training
an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
adjective
a precedent case
preceding in time, order, or importance.
example
People claimed that the 'precedent' set out by the sleeper hit in 1998 was finally superseded.
I just want to go back to some of the 'precedent' issues of the settlement process.
He said it was without 'precedent' and unfair - especially as the police had not been called in.
The court should never view a foreign legal decision as a 'precedent' in any way.
We fear there may well be a 'precedent' set for the rest of her school life.
Furthermore, this is a case of general importance and it may well set a 'precedent' .
We all have to go through the same nonsense, which seems crazy considering the 'precedent' set at the first hearing.
It is the sort of 'precedent' we are seeing in other legislation.
The 'precedent' it set does not augur well for future similar elections.
If this court hears the case, they say, any decision would set a 'precedent' and would have ramifications across the country.
I am going to break with the 'precedent' set by the previous speaker and actually talk about the bill before the House.
I want the kind of 'precedent' I have seen in Europe followed here.
The public sentiment would have been the necessity for humanitarian considerations to overcome 'precedent' this once.
This would be an example of 'precedent' activism but not separation-of-powers activism.
Once a power to detain is held to depend on 'precedent' fact, then of course anyone subjected to it can properly invoke habeas corpus.
Once these spaces are let go to development there would be no stopping further development because there would be a 'precedent' set.
What a pleasing 'precedent' any unlikely victory would set!
If 'precedent' holds, it won't be publishers of tax-help books alone who benefit.
His first and main ground is that the Inspector had no basis for his conclusion on the 'precedent' effect.
The result is a game of spot the allusion, with the final mass exodus dictated more by Chekhovian 'precedent' than any kind of political logic.
Historical 'precedent' shows pubs have changed their names through the years, usually for good reasons.
A lower court cannot set 'precedent' , and must follow any higher courts decision.
I guess the point I want you to consider is what sort of 'precedent' we are establishing here, because it is important for the future.
However, based on 'precedent' the cards are stacked against them.
Is this a 'precedent' we wish to set for other great regional powers as well?
It's a great adrenaline rush to set 'precedent' or prior learning on its ear.
All that has happened is that there is a set of 'precedent' requirements of a procedural kind before a court case can be commenced.
So the planners want to look at what 'precedent' they are setting.
I shall add to the definition of humanly free agents, that they are agents whose choices do not have fully deterministic 'precedent' causes.
This is both illogical and a 'precedent' we should not allow to be set.
Credits: Google Translate
